<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Occupational Medicine - current issue</title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Occupational Medicine - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-8405</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Occupational Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0962-7480</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/334?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/341?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/348?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/361?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/373?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/381?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CALENDAR]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CALENDAR]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Calendar</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this issue of Occupational Medicine]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hobson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this issue of Occupational Medicine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[We can eliminate occupational cancer from chemicals]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherrie, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[We can eliminate occupational cancer from chemicals]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Philip Jacques de Loutherbourg, Coalbrookdale at Night (1801): Oil on canvas, 68 x 106.5 cm. Science Museum, London.]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKiernan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Philip Jacques de Loutherbourg, Coalbrookdale at Night (1801): Oil on canvas, 68 x 106.5 cm. Science Museum, London.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Art and Occupation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: assessment models]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Abstract</b> The assessment of doctors&rsquo; health and fitness to practise is recognized as a specialist area of occupational medicine practice. This paper will consider the involvement of specialists from a variety of disciplines in the overall assessment process and will discuss some current assessment models. The paper will make recommendations for further developments in this area.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: assessment models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In-depth Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: the need for a bespoke model of assessment]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Abstract</b> Doctors' performance and fitness to practise are attracting increased attention. High profile cases have brought into question the assessment of fitness to practise and the monitoring of professional performance. In the UK, the chief medical adviser for England has proposed strengthening systems to improve the performance of doctors which include addressing problems of ill-health. The behaviour of the impaired physician, or the doctor&ndash;patient, presents unique challenges and a review of the various issues highlights the need to address how the medical profession and society deal with the occurrence of illness in doctors. Conditions such as mental ill-health and substance abuse may affect doctors' fitness to practise, but other conditions may also be relevant. This paper will discuss the occurrence of ill-health and the need for a bespoke model of assessment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: the need for a bespoke model of assessment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>327</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In-depth Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: performance problems in doctors and cognitive impairments]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> As a response to concerns over the safety of patient care and quality of care provided by doctors, there has been an increasing interest in identifying the reasons for medical errors.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> This paper reviews briefly the common neurocognitive causes for performance problems in doctors and provides an updated account of the current literature. Search on Medline and PsychINFO for English language articles between 1956 and September 2006 was performed, as well as a manual search by the authors for other relevant articles.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological assessment is increasingly accepted as an accurate evaluation tool to clarify the performance problems in doctors. Furthermore, it seems that neurocognitive difficulties are commonly found to be the cause for such problems.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> The performance problems in doctors need to be acknowledged &lsquo;better too soon than too late&rsquo;. Neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological assessment helps to create an accurate treatment and rehabilitation plan for the specific functional tasks of the particular doctor's duties.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pitkanen, M., Hurn, J., Kopelman, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: performance problems in doctors and cognitive impairments]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>333</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In-depth Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/334?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: treating addicted doctors]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/334?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Abstract</b> The literature describing the diagnostic process in the addicted doctor is scant. Figures from North America indicate that the prevalence of alcohol problems in doctors may be no higher than in the population as a whole, whereas high rates of prescription drug use have been recognized. This practice of self-treatment with controlled drugs is a &lsquo;unique concern&rsquo; for doctors. The development of substance misuse problems in doctors cannot be reduced to a single factor: Anxiety and depression, personality problems, stress at work, family stress, bereavement, an injury or accident at work, pain and a non-specific drift into drinking have been implicated. Early diagnosis is critical because doctors are often reluctant to seek help and colleagues reluctant to intervene. Medical schools and continuing medical education programmes must give greater emphasis to addiction and substance misuse in doctors with a view to reducing the incidence of &lsquo;impaired physicians&rsquo; and promoting and encouraging early treatment and rehabilitation. The relationship between the addiction psychiatrist and the occupational physician is key given that these problems occur at the interface between occupational health and regulatory systems. The need for individually tailored back to work programmes requires careful coordination and monitoring and may be difficult to implement without their involvement. Generally, the prognosis for doctors&rsquo; recovery is good and it is possible to predict which doctors will &lsquo;make it&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall, E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doctors' health and fitness to practise: treating addicted doctors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>340</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>334</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In-depth Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/341?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of psychosocial factors on low back pain in industrial workers]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/341?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Aim</b> To test the hypothesis that workplace psychosocial factors such as demand, control, support, job satisfaction and job appreciation can predict the future onset of disabling low back pain (LBP).</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> The present study involved a prospective cohort of 4500 Iranian industrial workers. Data were gathered by means of a self-reported questionnaire about LBP, as well as working life exposure, lifestyle factors, social exposures, co-morbidity, life events and psychosomatic complaints in 2004. All new episodes of disabling LBP resulting in medically certified sick leave during the 1-year follow-up registered by occupational health clinic inside the factory.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> The participation rate was good (85%). A total of 744 subjects reported current LBP (point prevalence cases). A total of 52 (&lt;2%) new episodes of disabling LBP were observed during the 1-year follow-up (incident cases). Male employees reported higher demands, lower control and lower support than female employees. Employees with high demands, low control, job strain, low job satisfaction and low job appreciation showed increased odds ratios, and these results were statistically significant.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> Few prospective studies in this field have been published, but all of them are related to industrialized countries. This prospective study suggests the aetiological role of job strain for LBP. The findings of this study indicate a substantial potential for disease prevention and health promotion at the workplace.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghaffari, M., Alipour, A., Farshad, A. A., Jensen, I., Josephson, M., Vingard, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of psychosocial factors on low back pain in industrial workers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>347</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>341</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/348?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occupational injury among full-time, part-time and casual health care workers]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/348?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> Previous epidemiological studies have conflicting suggestions on the association of occupational injury risks with employment category across industries. This specific issue has not been examined for direct patient care occupations in the health care sector.</p>
<p><b>Aims</b> To investigate whether work-related injury rates differ by employment category (part time, full time or casual) for registered nurses (RNs) in acute care and care aides (CAs) in long-term facilities.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> Incidents of occupational injury resulting in compensated time loss from work, over a 1-year period within three health regions in British Columbia (BC), Canada, were extracted from a standardized operational database. Detailed analysis was conducted using Poisson regression modeling.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Among 8640 RNs in acute care, 37% worked full time, 24% part time and 25% casual. The overall rates of injuries were 7.4, 5.3 and 5.5 per 100 person-years, respectively. Among the 2967 CAs in long-term care, 30% worked full time, 20% part time and 40% casual. The overall rates of injuries were 25.8, 22.9 and 18.1 per 100 person-years, respectively. In multivariate models, having adjusted for age, gender, facility and health region, full-time RNs had significantly higher risk of sustaining injuries compared to part-time and casual workers. For CAs, full-time workers had significantly higher risk of sustaining injuries compared to casual workers.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> Full-time direct patient care occupations have greater risk of injury compared to part-time and casual workers within the health care sector.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alamgir, H., Yu, S., Chavoshi, N., Ngan, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occupational injury among full-time, part-time and casual health care workers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>354</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>348</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/355?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can pre-placement health assessments predict subsequent sickness absence?]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/355?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> Sickness absence is a growing economic problem, due largely to the financial losses it incurs. The ability to identify employees likely to take greater than average sickness absence may provide managers with useful information at the pre-placement stage.</p>
<p><b>Aim</b> To confirm whether specific risk factors identified at the pre-placement health assessment could predict subsequent sickness absence.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> A total of 400 National Health Service pre-placement health questionnaires were analysed to allocate employees to low-, medium- or high-risk categories for subsequent sickness absence, using the risk table developed by C. J. M. Poole (Can sickness absence be predicted at the pre-placement health assessment? <I>Occup Med (Lond)</I> 1999; <b>49:</b>337&ndash;339) [<cross-ref type="bib" refid="bib1">1</cross-ref>]. Subsequent sickness absence was analysed to assess if there was an association between the allocated category and sickness absence taken.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Mean sickness absence hours per 1000 h worked were 22.5 (95% CI 18.2&ndash;27.2) in the low-risk group, 33.6 (27.2&ndash;40.7) in the medium-risk group and 44.7 (25.1&ndash;69.9) in the high-risk group (analysis of variance, <I>P</I> &le; 0.002), demonstrating a statistically significant difference in sickness absence taken in subsequent years.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> The results confirmed Poole's hypothesis that future sickness absence can be predicted at the pre-placement health assessment. Certain risk factors, namely female sex, age, smoking, history of at least two previous episodes of low-back pain and previous days sickness absence identified at pre-placement assessment, predict a greater than average subsequent sickness absence. However, the best model using identified risk factors only predicted 10&ndash;12% of the variation in sickness absence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucey, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can pre-placement health assessments predict subsequent sickness absence?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>355</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/361?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experience of workplace violence during medical speciality training in Turkey]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/361?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Aims</b> To determine the type, extent and effects of workplace violence among residents during postgraduate speciality training in various departments of medical schools in Turkey.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted in seven medical schools representing all geographical regions of Turkey. All physicians in speciality training in the selected medical schools were asked to complete a semi-structured &lsquo;violence questionnaire&rsquo; addressing the type (emotional, physical and sexual) and extent of violence experienced, the perpetrators of the violence and the victim's reactions to the experience.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> A total of 1712 residents out of 2442 completed the questionnaire. In all, 68% indicated they had experienced some form of workplace violence, 67% had experienced verbal violence, 16% had experienced physical violence and 3% had experienced sexual violence. The victims' most prevalent reactions to violence included being deeply disturbed but feeling they had to cope with it for the sake of their career (39%), being distressed (26%) but considering that such events are common in all occupations and discounting it and being confused and bewildered and unsure how to respond (19%). The most frequently named perpetrators of verbal violence were relatives/friends of patients (36%) and academic staff (36%), followed by other residents/senior residents (21%), patients (20%), heads of department (13%) and non-medical hospital staff (6%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> Physicians in speciality training in medical schools in Turkey are subject to significant verbal, physical or sexual violence. Precautions to prevent such exposure are urgently needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Acik, Y., Deveci, S. E., Gunes, G., Gulbayrak, C., Dabak, S., Saka, G., Vural, G., Can, G., Bilgin, N. G., Dundar, P. E., Erguder, T., Tokdemir, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experience of workplace violence during medical speciality training in Turkey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>366</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>361</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian hairdressers]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> There are occupational risks inherent to the activities of professional hairdressers, which are not frequently studied, and therefore not considered in the formulation of health policies for this group.</p>
<p><b>Aims</b> To verify the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) in hairdressers through symptom reports, to characterize the most frequently affected anatomical parts and to identify and analyse risk factors of WRMDs in hairdressing.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> A cross-sectional epidemiological study of 220 hairdressers from beauty parlours in S&atilde;o Paulo (Brazil) was carried out. Each hairdresser completed a self-administered questionnaire which included information on socio-demographic characteristics, working conditions and health-related musculoskeletal system complaints. Ergonomic analyses were also performed in six parlours.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> The prevalence of WRMDs was 71%. Risk factors were associated with psychosocial factors and factors related to discomfort and work fatigue such as lack of acknowledgement of work and uncomfortable posture at work [odds ratio (OR) = 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51&ndash;8.30], not feeling comfortable with body/neck/shoulders while working (OR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.40&ndash;5.54) and having &gt;15 years of professional activity (OR = 3.04; 95% CI 1.17&ndash;7.91).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion</b> Occupational risk factors associated with the development of WRMDs in hairdressers are related to biomechanical, organizational and psychosocial work factors. The high prevalence of WRMDs found highlights the importance of disseminating recommendations for prevention of symptoms with regards to the provision of suitable furniture, equipment and work tools, environmental conditions, size of workplace, work organization and psychosocial work factors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mussi, G., Gouveia, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian hairdressers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> Within a clinical context e-learning is comparable to traditional approaches of continuing medical education (CME). However, the occupational health context differs and until now the effect of postgraduate e-learning among occupational physicians (OPs) has not been evaluated.</p>
<p><b>Aim</b> To evaluate the effect of e-learning on knowledge on mental health issues as compared to lecture-based learning in a CME programme for OPs.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> Within the context of a postgraduate meeting for 74 OPs, a randomized controlled trial was conducted. Test assessments of knowledge were made before and immediately after an educational session with either e-learning or lecture-based learning.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> In both groups, a significant gain in knowledge on mental health care was found (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two educational approaches.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion</b> The effect of e-learning on OPs' mental health care knowledge is comparable to a lecture-based approach. Therefore, e-learning can be beneficial for the CME of OPs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugenholtz, N. I. R., de Croon, E. M., Smits, P. B., van Dijk, F. J. H., Nieuwenhuijsen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>372</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/373?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effectiveness of an educational programme on occupational disease reporting]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/373?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Occupational diseases are under reported. Targeted education of occupational physicians (OPs) may improve their rate of reporting occupational diseases.</p>
<p><b>Aim:</b> To study the effectiveness of an active multifaceted workshop aimed at improving OPs&rsquo; reporting of occupational diseases.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> We undertook a comparative study with 112 OPs in the intervention group and 571 OPs as comparisons. The intervention was a 1-day workshop. Measurements of occupational disease reporting activity in both groups in 6-month periods before and after the intervention were collected via the national registration system. Measurements of OPs&rsquo; knowledge, self-efficacy and satisfaction were made in the intervention group. Differences between the groups and predictive factors for reporting were subsequently analysed statistically.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The percentage of reporting OPs after the intervention was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the comparison group at 19 versus 11% (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). No differences were found in the average number of reported occupational diseases per reporting physician after the intervention: 3.7 (SD 5.37) versus 3.4 (SD 4.56) (not significant). The self-efficacy score was a predictive factor for reporting occupational diseases (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Measurements of knowledge and self-efficacy increased significantly (both parameters <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) and remained after half a year. Satisfaction was high (7.85 of 10).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> An active, multifaceted workshop on occupational diseases is effective in increasing the number of physicians reporting occupational diseases. Self-efficacy measures are a predictive factor for such reporting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smits, P. B. A., de Boer, A. G. E. M., Kuijer, P. P. F. M., Braam, I., Spreeuwers, D., Lenderink, A. F., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., van Dijk, F. J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effectiveness of an educational programme on occupational disease reporting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>373</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International Occupational Medicine: Croatia]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laliae, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International Occupational Medicine: Croatia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>376</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>International Occupational Medicine: Croatia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannu, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Website Review]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackie, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Website Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Website Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS)]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCarthy, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS)</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Monitor]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noone, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqn087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Monitor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>381</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Monitor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why I didn't become an occupational physician...]]></title>
<link>http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bailey, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/occmed/kqm124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why I didn't become an occupational physician...]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Occupational Medicine</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>381</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>